![](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125797127/642518103.jpeg)
Contents.Biography Spearman had an unusual background for a psychologist. In his childhood he was ambitious to follow an academic career. He first joined the as a regular officer of engineers in August 1883, and was promoted to on 8 July 1893, serving in the. After 15 years he resigned in 1897 to study for a PhD in experimental psychology.
In Britain, psychology was generally seen as a branch of and Spearman chose to study in under, because it was a center of the 'new psychology'—one that used the scientific method instead of metaphysical speculation. As Wundt was often absent due to his multiple duties and popularity, Spearman largely worked with and, both of whom he admired. He started in 1897, and after some interruption (he was recalled to the army during the, and served as a from February 1900 ) he obtained his degree in 1906. He had already published his seminal paper on the factor analysis of intelligence (1904).
![Spearman Spearman](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125797127/870508017.jpg)
In 1979, Richard Lesly graduated from Spearman High School. Richard went on to join the Air Force. After the military, he joined Amarillo PD then Austin PD. But enough about his history. This story isn't about Richard. This story is about our country. In 2011, the riots against our country had become worse and worse. Cops were being ambushed. The Spearman test has some other uses, which are explained near the end of this chapter. EXAMPLE 1—PEARSON REGRESSION An instructor wants to determine if there is a relationship between how long a student spends taking a final exam (2 hours are allotted) and his or her grade on the exam (students are free to depart upon completion).
Spearman met and impressed the psychologist who arranged for Spearman to replace him when he left his position at. Spearman stayed at University College until he retired in 1931.
Initially he was and head of the small psychological laboratory. In 1911 he was promoted to the. His title changed to Professor of Psychology in 1928 when a separate Department of Psychology was created.When Spearman was elected to the in 1924 the citation read:Dr. Spearman has made many researches in experimental psychology. His many published papers cover a wide field, but he is especially distinguished by his pioneer work in the application of mathematical methods to the analysis of the human mind, and his original studies of correlation in this sphere.
He has inspired and directed research work by many pupils.Chief amongst these achievements was the discovery of the general factor in human intelligence, and his subsequent development of a theory of 'g' and synthesis of empirical work on ability.Spearman was strongly influenced by the work of. Galton did pioneering work in psychology and developed, the main statistical tool used by Spearman.In statistics, Spearman developed (1904), a non-parametric version of the conventional, as well as both the widely used (1907), and the earliest version of a 'factor analysis' (Lovie & Lovie, 1996, p. 81). His statistical work was not appreciated by his University College colleague and there was a long feud between them.Although Spearman achieved most recognition in his day for his statistical work, he regarded this work as subordinate to his quest for the fundamental laws of psychology, and he is now similarly renowned for both.Charles Spearman always insisted that his work be applied in and urged so in his Maudsley lecture to the. While some work has been made on these lines by pupils and associates of his, the development of factor analysis as a tool of psychiatry followed a different path than he had intended.
Regardless, his indirect contributions towards psychiatry were considerable.Spearman's life both began and ended in the city of London. He had three daughters along with one son, who died early on in 1941 in Crete.
Theory of intelligence A record of Spearman's views on g (and also those of and ) was made in the course of the -sponsored International Examinations Inquiry Meetings.Here, Spearman gives a compact summary of his findings and theory of g:When asked what G is, one has to distinguish between the meanings of terms and the facts about things. G means a particular quantity derived from statistical operations.
Under certain conditions the score of a person at a mental test can be divided into two factors, one of which is always the same in all tests, whereas the other varies from one test to another; the former is called the general factor or G, while the other is called the specific factor. This then is what the G term means, a score-factor and nothing more. But this meaning is sufficient to render the term well defined so that the underlying thing is susceptible to scientific investigation; we can proceed to find out facts about this score-factor, or G factor. We can ascertain the kind of mental operations in which it plays a dominant part as compared with the other or specific factor. And so the discovery has been made that G is dominant in such operations as reasoning, or learning Latin; whereas it plays a very small part indeed in such operation (sic) as distinguishing one tone from another.
G tends to dominate according as the performance involves the perceiving of relations, or as it requires that relations seen in one situation should be transferred to another. On weighing the evidence, many of us used to say that this G appears to measure some form of mental energy.
But in the first place, such a suggestion is apt to invite needless controversy. This can be avoided by saying more cautiously that G behaves as if it measured an energy. In the second place, however, there seems to be good reason for changing the concept of energy to that of 'power' (which, of course, is energy or work divided by time). In this way, one can talk about mind power in much the same manner as about horse power.G is in the normal course of events determined innately; a person can no more be trained to have it in higher degree than he can be trained to be taller. 156 –157).There was also another co-factor as proposed by Spearman that was special intelligence.
The special intelligence was for individuals who accomplished high success results in the same tests. However, later Spearman introduced group factor that was particular to those correlations that were not a result of factor g or s.
His ideas were in 1938 criticized on paper by psychologist who argued his own experiments showed that intelligence formed seven primary categories: numerical, reasoning, spatial, perceptual, memory, verbal fluency and verbal comprehension. Thurstone ultimately agreed with Spearman that there was a general factor among ability measures. Subsequently, (1963) also supported the general ability concept theorized by Spearman but highlighted two forms of ability, distinguished by their development in older age:.As time progressed, Spearman increasingly argued that g was not, from a psychological point of view, a single ability but composed of two very different abilities which normally worked closely together. These he called 'eductive' ability and 'reproductive' ability. The former term comes from the Latin root 'educere' – which means to 'draw out' and thus refers to the ability to make meaning out of confusion. He claimed that to understand these different abilities 'in their trenchent contrast, their ubiquitous cooperation, and their genetic interlinkage' would, for the study of 'individual differences – and even cognition itself' – be 'the very beginning of wisdom.'
Despite Spearman arguing that g was what emerged from a large battery of tests, i.e., that it was not measured perfectly by any single test, the fact that g-theory suggested that much of ability could be captured in a single factor, and his suggestion that 'the eduction of relations and correlates' underlay this general factor led to the quest for tests of this general ability.
![](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125797127/642518103.jpeg)